UFO Wreckage & Implant Sample Analysis

Orestis Lazanakis discusses his investigation into UAP crash wreckage & ET implant samples and shares new data on SEM & isotopic analysis. He will describe the origin & composition of these samples, provide insights into their novel nature & isotope ratios, and offer speculation on what this could mean in terms of the larger scope of NHI materials science & technology.

This presentation focuses on the analysis of physical samples in ufology, arguing that such evidence surpasses witness testimony. The speaker highlights Dr. Roger Lear’s research on surgically removed implants, exhibiting unusual properties like shape-shifting and apparent self-awareness. Microscopic analysis reveals complex structures, potentially including carbon nanotubes, suggesting a connection to the electrogravitic effect.

The presentation also examines numerous reports of spherical UFOs (USOs), particularly in Greece, linking their behavior to documented accounts and suggesting a potential connection to the Bifield-Brown effect. The speaker proposes that these small, spherical objects may act as probes or drones, potentially indicating a non-human intelligence (NHI) interest in observing or protecting humanity. The presentation concludes with a call for more evidence-based research.

The Intriguing Case of the Metallic Implants:

The presentation begins with a compelling discussion of surgically removed implants from patients, a research area pioneered by Dr. Roger Lear. These implants, of unknown origin and purpose, exhibit intriguing properties. Some are transparent or chameleon-like, others feel like ceramic, and many possess hair-like protrusions. (00:02:00)

Microscopic examination using Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM) reveals intricate internal structures, including fibers containing even smaller fibers. One particularly remarkable implant proved uncuttable, resembling glass with claw-like appendages that anchored it to the skin. (00:03:00)

The challenge of preserving these delicate samples is highlighted. One sample disintegrated into dust, yet microscopic analysis still revealed the presence of fibers. Another, remarkably, changed shape and even reassembled itself, exhibiting a level of apparent self-awareness that defied explanation. (00:04:00)

X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) and Microscopic Analysis Reveal Surprising Composition:

This resilient sample, approximately 1mm in diameter, was carefully bent for XRF analysis. The results were astonishing: the object contained nickel and titanium, commonly used in medical stents and implants. If alloyed correctly, this material forms a safe, biocompatible memory alloy. X-ray diffraction confirmed this composition. (00:05:00)

SEM analysis of the object’s interior revealed a striking similarity to a UFO fragment analyzed by Steve Colburn. Both objects exhibited micro-voids that split with depth and contained an arachnoidal network resembling carbon nanotubes or nanorods. (00:06:00)

The Electrogravitic Hypothesis:

Researchers considered the possibility of the Bifield-Brown effect, also known as the electrogravitic effect. The high dielectric constants of coated nanotubes (up to a million) found in these objects align with the requirements of this effect, suggesting a potential mechanism for propulsion. The multi-walled carbon nanotube cross-section resembles a capacitor, further supporting this hypothesis. (00:07:00)

While definitive proof of propulsion remains elusive, the possibility is tantalizing. The creation of a prototype device could potentially prove or disprove the electrogravitic effect as a viable propulsion method. (00:08:00)

From Metallic Implants to Underwater Phenomena: The USO Connection:

The presentation then shifts focus to Unidentified Submerged Objects (USOs). The speaker highlights the increased information gleaned from USO sightings due to the interaction of these objects with water. (00:09:00)

An AI-generated image and report detailing a USO sighting in Kefalonia, Greece, is presented. The report describes three brown spheres entering the water at high speed without impact, followed by the emergence of a transparent 20-meter sphere emitting a high-pitched sound. This behavior aligns with observations documented in Carl Fein’s “UFOs in Water,” reinforcing the connection between UFOs and USOs. (00:10:00)

Spheres, Cold Spots, and Close Encounters:

The speaker shares personal communications with Patrick Jackson, author of “Sphere Network,” detailing the unusual effects observed near spherical objects. These include cold spots and temperature fluctuations, with larger objects causing adverse health effects. Smaller spheres, however, seem to exhibit less harmful effects. (00:11:00)

Anecdotal accounts from the speaker’s personal network further illustrate the range of interactions with these objects, from tingling sensations upon contact to more severe incidents involving burns and hospitalizations. (00:12:00)

The BET Sphere and Beyond: A Pattern Emerges:

A striking resemblance is noted between several reported spheres, including the BET sphere (allegedly X-rayed, showing two smaller spheres inside), Jim Marlin’s sphere (from a UFO), and a sphere photographed by the speaker’s friend, Ion Panides. This suggests a potential connection and raises the possibility that these spheres may function as probes or drones. (00:13:00)

Numerous reports of spherical UFOs are cited, particularly in Greece, near locations such as Mount Olympus and the Taygetos mountain range. The high frequency of these reports, coupled with the consistent physical characteristics of the objects, strongly suggests a non-human origin. (00:14:00)

Conclusion: A Call for Evidence-Based Research:

The presentation concludes with a strong emphasis on the need for evidence-based research, echoing Dr. Lear’s call for rigorous scientific investigation. The speaker suggests that the prevalence of small spherical UFOs in populated areas may indicate a protective or observational purpose, hinting at a potential interest in the preservation of humanity by a non-human intelligence. (00:15:00) The presentation ends with an invitation for questions and further discussion.